EPSTEIN
page 5 / 1412 . OCR, unverified
Edwards v. Mazzuca,
No. 00 Civ. 2290 (RJS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007)... ceeceeeeeeeeeeseeeteeees 234
Falter v. United States,
23 F.2d 420 (2d Cir. 1928) ooo. ceeeeceeececseeceeeeeeneeseeecseecaeesseeesneecsaecaeeenessneesieeseaeeeeneseneesanessaeen 45
Fisher v. United States,
A2S U.S. 391 (1976) oo. eeeceececeneceeeeeeneesaceceaeceseeeeneesaeecaeeaeessneesaeecsaeceseeseneesaeessaeenteeseetensaes 140, 146
Flagg v. Yonkers Sav. & Loan Ass’n,
396 F.3d 178 (2d Cir, 2005) oo... ceeeeeseseeeesseeenneceeeeseeesacecsaeeseessneesaeesaeeaeeeseeesaeessaeenteeeeneeeaees 143
Franks v. Delaware,
A388 U.S. 154 (1978) ooo eececeeeceeeeeseeecneeenseeeeneesaeecaeenseeeeneesaeecaeeeeeseneesanersaeees 166, 169, 170, 171
Gatto,
17 Cr. 686 (LAK) ....eceeceeeceessceceeeceseeeseeeseeecsaeceaeeesneesneessaecnaeesseessaeesaeecaeesseeseneesaeeenaeeseeeeeneeeaees 275
Golino v. City of New Haven,
OSU Paid BG: (2a Cie, POF) ccesmcnmoanen sxememenaoe erm SERROMRNERNORN KRIS semmeemeERNS seme 125
Graham v. Connor,
A490 U.S. 386 (1989) ooo. eececeeeceeeeeseeeceeceaeeseneesaeecsaecaeesneesanecsaesaeesseeesaeecsaeesseeeeneesaeessaeesneees 151
Grant v. United States,
282 F.2d 165 (2d Cir. 1960)... cee ceececececeseeeeeeeseeeceeeceseeesneeseeecaeceaesseeesaeecaeesseeseneesaeessaeesrenees 164
Greer v. Miller,
ASS LS. 156 (1987) orm ano ascamcnemm anemones ca mreG ZENER mLAOSSW ORR Ha NONE CONTR LNA ECTS ML 158
Grunewald v. United States,
353 U.S. 391 (1957) ..eeeceeecceeceeesceceeeeeeeeeneesaeecsaeceeeessneesaeecsaeeseeseneesaeecaeesseeseneesaeessaeeneeseeneeenees 248
Hamling v. United States,
A18 U.S. 87 (1974) oe eeccesececeneeeeeeeeneesaeecaeeeaeeeeneesaeecnaeesaeessneesaeecsaeenseesseeesaeesnaeeesneseneeeaees 225, 227
Vi
DOJ-OGR-00002941
==================== END OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg.txt ====================
==================== START OF root__DOJ-OGR-00002942.jpg.txt ====================
METADATA_SOURCE: .
METADATA_FILENAME: DOJ-OGR-00002942.jpg
----------------------------------------
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 239
Hemphill v. United States,
BOD FO 4S: (Sth, Cie, 19GB) cscsmassemsvss sccensomnsusrews asttenwn ianite shseReOnSENESNE LAEREORTAAURETSND SaNROOL SEAT SES 268
Herring v. United States,
S555 US. 135 (2009) oe eceseseeesesseeseeneesecneeseesseseessesseveecnevseeneeeesaessesaesaevsesnavseesaeeeesaeseeseeenees 123
Howell v. Superintendent Rockview SCT,
939 F.3d 260 (2d Cir. 2019) oo... eee seseesessecsseseesseseessessevsecnevsecneeseesnessesaesaeverenevseeneeseesaeseesaeenee 302
Huddleston v. United States,
A85 U.S. 681 (1988) oes ceeesecseesecneesecseseeseseessesaevsecnevsecneeseesaeseesaesaevaesnevsesnaeseenaeseesaesaeeaeeaeed 254
In re Enter. Mort. Acceptance Co. Sec. Litig. (“Enterprise”,
), 391 F.3d 401 (2d Cir. 2004)... ee eeeseeesecneseecneesecneeseesaeseessesseveesneeseeneeseesaesaeeaeeneeats 36, 43, 44
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Apr. 19, 1991,
aD Feed TE) CER CI, TT crema semanas smart omemuRRCoReNE aLmsRMERACSEES ease 108, 113
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992,
1 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1993) oo. cieeceseccseescsseseessessessecsevseeneeseenseseesaeseevaecneveeenaeeesaeseesaesaeearens 140, 145
In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
826 F.2d 1166 (1987) ....eceeescesseeeesseenevseceesecsnessesaesaevsesnevsecneeseensesseaesaeveesneverenaeseesaeseeaeeaeeatens 136
In re Grand Jury Subpoena,
B26 Fd 1468 (Ai Gi, TORE) ccna concn sasmememncennews «.ceemocreaiewt c.sNnIL SONS SL SOTREOE SRNANE MaAORTNRARUER SR 149
In re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 29,
1999, 191 F.3d 173 (2d Cir, 1999) ooo ecesessessesneeeeeneeseceeseesaeseesaesaeveeenevseenaeseesaeseesaeeaeeetens 139
In Re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Jan. 5,
1988, 847 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir. 1988)... cee eceeesseeseseeveeeneeseceeesecsaeseesaesaevsecneeseenaeseesaesetsaeeaeeatens 136
Inre US.,
834 F.2d 283 (2d Cir. 1987) 0... eecseeccsesecssessessessevsecnevsecneeeesaessesaesaevsesnevseenaeeeesaessesaeeaeeerens 284
In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas,
924 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2013), aff'd, 579 F. App’x 37 (2d Cir. 2014) oe eens 140
Int’! Equity Invs., Inc. v. Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd.,
No. 05 Civ. 2745 (JGK) (RLE), 2010 WL 779314 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2010)... ce eeeeeeeeeee 111
Johnson v. United States,
520 U.S. 461 (1997) occ ceceeceseseesseeevsecsevsecneeseessesseaecaevsecnevseenaeeresaessessesaevsesneverenaeeeesaeraeeaeeneed 200
Kungys v. United States,
A85 U.S. 759 (1988) oo. eceseseessesseeseeneeseceessessessessecseveecnevsecsceseesaessesaessevaesnevereneeseesaessesaesseseeeneed 222
Landgraf vy. USI Film Products,
eS 35, 36, 41, 42
Leocal v. Ashcroft,
543 U.S. 1 (2004) ooo cececcseescnsesecnsessesaessevseenevsecneeseenaeseesaeseesaesaeveesnevseenaeeeesaeseeaeeaeeareneed 56, 57
Madanes v. Madanes,
186 F.R.D. 279 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)... ccceccessssceseseeesesseenevsecneeseesaeseesaeseessesaevseenevseenaeseesaesaeeaeenees 141
Martindell v. Int’l Tel. and Tel. Corp.,